Cascade Locks wants casino

In response to Tom Rousseau's anti-casino letter of Jan 12, I would like to comment on the 2008 professional polling firm he refers to. They came to my house while we were having some pro-casino friends over for dinner. They began their poll, discovered all six adults present were pro-casino and then tore up our questionnaires. It was obvious to us that they did not want our voices included in the poll. Prior Cascade Locks City polls put the support for the casino at 67 percent. A port election where one candidate was very pro-casino and the other was very anti-casino resulted in an 80 percent vote for the pro-casino candidate. There is support for the casino in Cascade Locks and just saying there is none won't change the facts. If the EIS is full of holes, gaps and etc. as mentioned, why weren't those items brought out during the extraordinary review period? It is pretty simple: There are no gaps or holes and simply saying there are does not create gaps and holes. While I can understand that residents of Hood River may not wish the casino in their city, we do want it in ours. How would the city of Hood River like it if we began a campaign to end wind surfing and skiing near Hood River because of the problems attached to those activities? The increased traffic caused by those activities causes pollution in the Gorge. Maybe we should also advocate for shutting down Multnomah Falls as over a million visitors a year visit there and cause further pollution and congestion. Oh, it is OK for you to have yours, but we can't have ours? When the anti-casino people begin campaigning against other Gorge recreation and activities they will have some credibility, but in the meanwhile they seem to be following the Grande Ronde Tribe's agenda to prevent any competition. Arni Kononen Cascade Locks.