By RAELYNN RICARTE

As I mentioned during our "warm" discussion in your office yesterday, I take great offense at your modification of my letter before printing. The end result of your "editing" was to make it a collection of disjointed thoughts and babble, exactly as intended. Although this result certainly caused my letter to closely resemble many of your news articles, my standard is much higher. I had planned to request that you re-print my letter in its original form. However, I believe that the printing of the portions you removed "to comply with paper policy and meet space restrictions are much more revealing as to the bias of your paper. The deleted portions are as follows: